Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/4535
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallDe’ Michieli Vitturi, M.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallClarke, A. B.; School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, Usaen
dc.contributor.authorallNeri, A.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallVoight, B.; College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USAen
dc.date.accessioned2008-12-09T10:46:44Zen
dc.date.available2008-12-09T10:46:44Zen
dc.date.issued2008-08-15en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/4535en
dc.description.abstractWe develop a steady-state, two-phase flow model of magma ascent through an axisymmetric conduit of variable radius R and length L in order to quantify relationships between conduit geometry and magma ascent dynamics. Holding boundary conditions and chamber magma properties constant, we vary conduit geometry systematically and independently, such that the upper conduit radius increases or decreases by a factor of Rt /Rb (radius ratio; 0.4 ≤ Rt /Rb ≤ 2.5), above a change initiation height H (0.1 ≤ H /L ≤ 0.7), and over length Le (Le /L = 0.2), where Rt and Rb are conduit radius above (t) and below (b) the radius change and H is the height above the top of the magma chamber. Conduit widening causes a drop in overpressure and corresponding increase in gas volume fraction and magma acceleration over the whole length of the conduit, with all changes increasing in magnitude with increasing radius ratio. Magma ascent rate increases roughly as R2 and volumetric flow rate subsequently increases as R4 when Rt = Rb = R. Both increasing Rt for a fixed Rb (increasing radius ratio) and increasing Rb for a fixed Rt (decreasing radius ratio), increase volume flow and magma ascent rates. Compared to changes in geometry, small changes in chamber pressure (< 5%) have a weak effect on flow rate. Many model runs produce a magma plug at the top of the conduit, largely due to permeable gas loss through conduit walls. In general, large radii and low radius ratios (i.e., nearly cylindrical conduits) favor thin, low-density plugs, which may facilitate sudden destruction of a plug, and thus enhance the likelihood of explosive over extrusive eruptions. These findings suggest that changes in conduit geometry, such as those caused by conduit erosion during explosive eruptions or by accretion of magma along conduit walls, are strongly coupled to magma ascent dynamics and should not be ignored when interpreting changes in eruptive behavior.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofEarth and Planetary Science Lettersen
dc.relation.ispartofseries3-4/272 (2008)en
dc.subjectconduit dynamicsen
dc.subjectconduit geometryen
dc.subjectmagma ascenten
dc.subjecteffusion rateen
dc.subjectcomputational modelen
dc.titleEffects of conduit geometry on magma ascent dynamics in dome-forming eruptionsen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber567-578en
dc.identifier.URLhttp://scienceserver.cilea.it/cgi-bin/sciserv.pl?collection=journals&journal=0012821x&issue=v272i3-4&article=567_eocgomadide&form=pdf&file=file.pdfen
dc.subject.INGV05. General::05.01. Computational geophysics::05.01.99. General or miscellaneousen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.epsl.2008.05.025en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico3.6. Fisica del vulcanismoen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextreserveden
dc.contributor.authorDe’ Michieli Vitturi, M.en
dc.contributor.authorClarke, A. B.en
dc.contributor.authorNeri, A.en
dc.contributor.authorVoight, B.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Earth and Mineral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USAen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptArizona State University, USA-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Geosciences, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6750-9245-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3536-3624-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent05. General-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
EPSL_DeMichieliV et al _2008.pdf1.52 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

28
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s)

175
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s)

19
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric