Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/4499
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallStrollo, A.; GFZ, Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germanyen
dc.contributor.authorallBindi, D.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallParolai, S.; GFZ, Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germanyen
dc.contributor.authorallJäckel, K. H.; GIPP Geophysical Instrumental Pool Potsdam, Potsdam, Germanyen
dc.date.accessioned2008-12-09T08:31:40Zen
dc.date.available2008-12-09T08:31:40Zen
dc.date.issued2008-02en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/4499en
dc.description.abstractFollowing the ongoing debate about suitability of short-period sensor for seismic noise measurements at frequencies lower than 1Hz, in this study we compare recordings from two different seismometers (Güralp CMG-3ESPC and Mark L4C-3D) installed side by side in the GeoForschungsZentrum laboratory. The comparison carried out in terms of Power Spectral Density and coherency analysis shows an excellent agreement between the shortperiod and the broad-band recordings in the frequency band 0.2–20 Hz. Therefore, this result highlights that with a calibrated short-period sensor one can obtain the same results that would be obtained by using a broad-band seismometer in the band of engineering interest.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameSpringeren
dc.relation.ispartofBulletin of Earthquake Engineeringen
dc.relation.ispartofseries1/6 (2008)en
dc.subjectShort-period sensor, Broad-band sensor, Noise measurementsen
dc.subjectCoherency analysisen
dc.titleOn the suitability of 1 s geophone for ambient noise measurements in the 0.1–20Hz frequency range: experimental outcomesen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber141-147en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.10. Instruments and techniquesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10518-008-9061-xen
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico4.2. TTC - Scenari e mappe di pericolosità sismicaen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextreserveden
dc.contributor.authorStrollo, A.en
dc.contributor.authorBindi, D.en
dc.contributor.authorParolai, S.en
dc.contributor.authorJäckel, K. H.en
dc.contributor.departmentGFZ, Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germanyen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentGFZ, Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germanyen
dc.contributor.departmentGIPP Geophysical Instrumental Pool Potsdam, Potsdam, Germanyen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptOGS - Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale-
crisitem.author.deptGIPP Geophysical Instrumental Pool Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9602-6077-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8619-2220-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9084-7488-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
Strollo_et_al_2008_BEE.pdfMain article466.45 kBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

26
checked on Feb 7, 2021

Page view(s)

109
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s)

22
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric