Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Authors: ||Devoti, R.*|
|Title: ||New GPS constraints on the kinematics of the Apennines subduction|
|Title of journal: ||Earth and Planetary Science Letters|
|Series/Report no.: ||/273 (2008)|
|Issue Date: ||30-Aug-2008|
|Abstract: ||We present the velocity field of the Italian area derived from continuous GPS observations from 2003 to 2007.
The GPS sites were installed by different institutions and for different purposes; they cover the whole
country with a mean inter-site distance of about 60 km and provide a valuable source of data to map the
present day kinematics of the region.
The absolute ITRF2005 rotation poles and rates of Eurasia, Africa and Adriatic plates are estimated, to study
the kinematics along their boundaries in the Apennines belt.
The Corsica–Sardinia block, coherently moving as the Eurasia plate, is used as reference of the upper plate for
the Apennines subduction zone.We apply a simple kinematic model to estimate the rates and spatial pattern
of the subduction along the Apennines. We identify at least four different, independently moving, lower
plates, i.e., the Adriatic (diverging and internally segmented), Ionian, Sicily and Africa (converging) plates
with different subduction rates. The conservative estimates of the subduction rate are ~5 mm/yr in the
Calabrian Arc, ~1.5 mm/yr in Sicily, and ~0.9 mm/yr in the northern Apennines. This variegate mixture of
behaviors seems to reflect the variable lithospheric thickness and composition of the lower plates inherited
from the Mesozoic rifting. An unexpected along strike contraction is observed along the western side of the
Velocities are estimated both relative to Eurasia, and relative to the deep and shallow hotspot reference
frames (HSRF). The hotspot representation seems more coherent with the geophysical and geological
constraints along the subduction system, in which the Adriatic and Ionian plates move SW-ward and their
deeper slab portions provide an obstacle to the opposite relative mantle flow.
All these patterns better reconcile if the subduction process is conceived as a passive feature controlled by
the far field plate velocities and the relative “eastward” mantle flow acting on a disrupted slab.|
|Appears in Collections:||04.07.04. Plate boundaries, motion, and tectonics|
Papers Published / Papers in press
Files in This Item:
|Devoti et al., 2008.pdf||2.86 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.