Earth-prints repository, logo   Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia

Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
 
|earth-prints home page | roma library | bologna library | catania library | milano library | napoli library | palermo library

Earth-prints >
Affiliation >
INGV >
Papers Published / Papers in press >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/4078

Share this record with your favourite social network:     Del.icio.us     Citeulike     Connotea
Facebook     Stumble it!     reddit    
Title: Could the Mw = 9.3 Sumatra Earthquake Trigger a Geomagnetic Jerk?
Authors: Florindo, F.*
De Michelis, P.*
Piersanti, A.*
Boschi, E.*
Keywords: Sumatra Earthquake
Geomagnetic Jerk
Issue Date: 22-Mar-2005
Publisher: AGU
Title of journal: Eos Trans. AGU
Series/Report no.: 12 / 86 (2005)
Abstract: The magnetic field observed at the Earth’s surface is not a stationary feature. It is characterized by time variations ranging from milliseconds (micropulsations) to millions of years (the time interval between field reversals). Time variations with periods of a year or longer are related to Earth’s outer core sources, whereas for shorter timescales an external origin is invoked (i.e., solar activity). One of the most interesting time variations of the geomagnetic field is represented by the “geomagnetic jerk.” It is idealized as a rapid change in the slope of the secular variation, defined as the first derivative of the geomagnetic field. This means that the secular variation roughly appears as a series of straightline segments separated by geomagnetic jerks.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/4078
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press
04.05.02. Geomagnetic field variations and reversals
04.07.02. Geodynamics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
2005EO120004.pdfmain article54.37KbAdobe PDFView/Open
  • Alexandrescu,M.,D.Gibert,G.Hulot,J.-L.Le Mouël,and
  • G.Saracco (1996),Worldwide wavelet analysis of geomagnetic
  • jerks, J.Geophys.Res.,101,21,975–21,994.
  • Alfonsi, L.,A. Piersanti, and G. Spada (1997), Did the
  • 1977 Sumba earthquake excite the Chandler wobble?,
  • Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.,153, 287–292.
  • Bellanger, E., J.-L. Le Mouël, M.Mandea,and
  • S. Labrosse (2001), Chandler wobble and geomagnetic
  • jerks,Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.,124, 95–103.
  • Bloxam, J., S.Zatman, and M.Dumberry (2002),The
  • origin of geomagnetic jerks, Nature,420, 65–68.
  • Chao,B. F. (2005), Did the 26 December 2004 Sumatra,
  • Indonesia, earthquake disrupt the Earth’s rotation
  • as the mass media have said?, Eos Trans.AGU,
  • 86(1), 1–2.
  • Gibert,D.,M.Holschneider, and J.-L. Le Mouël (1998),
  • Wavelet analysis of the Chandler wobble,
  • J.Geophys. Res.,103, 27,069–27,089.
  • Gross, R. S. (2000),The excitation of the Chandler
  • wobble,Geophys. Res. Lett.,27, 2329–2332.
  • Gross, R. S., and B. F.Chao, (1985), Excitation study of
  • the LAGEOS-derived Chandler wobble, J.Geophys.
  • Res.,90, 9369–9380.
  • Malin, S. R. C., and B. M.Hodder (1982),Was the 1970
  • geomagnetic jerk of internal or external origin?,
  • Nature,296, 726–728.
  • Mandea,M., E. Bellanger, and J.-L. Le Mouël (2000),
  • A geomagnetic jerk for the end of the 20th century?,
  • Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.,183, 369–373.
  • Sabadini, R.,A. Piersanti, and G. Spada (1995),
  • Toroidal/poloidal partitioning of global postseismic
  • deformation,Geophys. Res. Lett.,22, 985–988.
  • Waddington, R.,D.Gubbins, and N.Baber (1995),
  • Geomagnetic field analysis: 5. Determining steady
  • core-surface flows directly from geomagnetic
  • observations,Geophys. J. Int.,122, 326–350.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! ICT Support, development & maintenance are provided by theAePIC team @CILEA.Powered onDSpace Software. Feedback