Earth-prints repository, logo   Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia

Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
 
|earth-prints home page | roma library | bologna library | catania library | milano library | napoli library | palermo library

Earth-prints >
Affiliation >
INGV >
Papers Published / Papers in press >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/3978

Share this record with your favourite social network:     Del.icio.us     Citeulike     Connotea
Facebook     Stumble it!     reddit    
Title: A discussion of the uniqueness of a Laplacian potential when given only partial field information on a sphere
Authors: Lowes, F. J.*
De Santis, A.*
Duka, B.*
Keywords: geomagnetic field
potential theory
spherical harmonic analysis
uniqueness
Issue Date: 1995
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Title of journal: Geophysical Journal International
Series/Report no.: 2 / 121 (1995)
Abstract: For a vector field defined by a scalar potential outside a surface enclosing all the sources, it is well known that the potential is defined uniquely if either the potential itself, or its derivative normal to the surface, is known everywhere on the surface. For a spherical surface, the normal derivative is the radial component of the field; the horizontal (vector) component of the field also gives uniqueness (except for any monopole contribution). This paper discusses the way other partial information of the field on the spherical surface can give a unique, or almost unique, knowledge of the external potential/field, bringing together and correcting previous work. For convenience the results are given in the context of the geomagnetic field B. This is often expressed in terms of its local Cartesian components (X, Y, Z), equivalent to (-Bθ, BΦ, -Br); it can also be expressed in terms of Z and the vector horizontal component H = (X, Y). Alternatively, local "spherical polar" components (F, I, D) are used, where F = |B|, the inclination I is the angle in the vertical plane downward from H to B, and the declination D is the angle in the horizontal plane eastward from north to H. Knowledge of X over the sphere gives a complete knowledge of the potential, apart from that of any monopole (which is zero in geomagnetism), and Y gives the potential except for any axially symmetric part (which can be provided by a knowledge of X along a meridian, or of H along any path from pole to pole). In terms of (F, I, D) the situation is more complicated; either F or the total angle (I, D) needs to be known throughout a finite volume; for the latter, this paper shows how, in principle, the actual potential can be determined (except for an unknown scaling factor). Similarly D on the sphere also needs a knowledge of |H| on a line from (magnetic) pole to pole. We also discuss how these various properties affect the determination, by surface integration, of the Gauss coefficients of the field representation in terms of spherical harmonics.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/3978
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press
05.05.99. General or miscellaneous
04.05.05. Main geomagnetic field

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Lowes_desantis_duka_1995.pdf199.02KbAdobe PDFView/Open
  • Backus, G.E., 1968. Applications of a non-linear boundary value
  • problem for Laplace's equation to gravity and geomagnetic
  • intensity surveys, Q. J. Mech. appl. Math., 21, 195-221.
  • Backus, G.E., 1970. Non-uniqueness of the external geomagnetic
  • field determined by surface intensity measurements. J. geophys.
  • Res., 75,6339-6341.
  • Backus, G.E., 1974. Detemination of the external geomagnetic
  • field from intensity measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., l, 21.
  • Bloxham, J., 1985. Geomagnetic secular variation, PhD Thesis,
  • Cambridge University, UK.
  • Chapman, S. & Bartels, J., 1940. Geomagnetism, Vol II. Clarendon
  • Press, Oxford.
  • De Santis, A., Falcone, C. & Lowes, F.J., 1995. Remarks on the
  • mean-square values of the geomagnetic field and its
  • components, Annali di Geopica, submitted.
  • Gubbins, D., 1986. Global models of the magnetic field in historical
  • times: augmenting declination observations with archeo- and
  • paleo-magnetic data, J. Geomagn. Geoelect., 38, 715-720,
  • Kawasaki, K., Matsushita, S. & Cain, J.C., 1989. Least squares and
  • integral methods for the spherical harmonic analysis of the
  • Sq-field, Pure appl. Geophys., 131,357-370.
  • Kono, M., 1976. Uniqueness problems in the spherical harmonic
  • analysis of the geomagnetic field direction data, J. Geomagn.
  • Geoelect., 28, 11-29.
  • Langel, R.A., 1987. The main field, in Geomagnetism, Vol. I,
  • pp 249-512, ed. Jacobs, J.A., Academic Press, London.
  • Lowes, F.J., 1966, Mean-square values on sphere of spherical
  • harmonic vector fields, J. geophys, Res., 7l, 2179.
  • Lowes, F.J., 1975. Vector errors in spherical harmonic analysis of
  • scalar data, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 42, 637-651.
  • Lucke, Q., 1957. Über Mittelwerte von Energiedichten der
  • Kraftfelder, in Wiss. Z. der Päd. Hochschule Potsdam,
  • Jahrgang 3, Heft l, 39-467.
  • Proctor, M.R.E. & Gubbins, D,, 1990. Analysis of geomagnetic
  • directional data, Geophys. J. Int., l00, 69-77.
  • Schmidt, A., 1889. Mathematische Entwicklungen zur allgemeinen
  • Theorie des Erdmagnetismus, in Archiv det Deuischen
  • Seewarte, XII annual edition, no. 3, 1-29, Hamburg.
  • Schmidt, A., 1895. Mitteilungen über eine neue Berechnung des
  • Erdmagnetischen Potentials, Abhandl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss., 19,
  • 1-66.
  • Vestine, E.H., 1941. On the analysis of surface magnetic fields by
  • integrals, Part 1, Terr. Magn. Atm. Electr., 46, 2741.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! ICT Support, development & maintenance are provided by theAePIC team @CILEA.Powered onDSpace Software. Feedback