Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/3796
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallVichi, M.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallAllen, J. I.; PML, UKen
dc.contributor.authorallHardman-Mountford, N.; PML, UKen
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-18T07:57:09Zen
dc.date.available2008-04-18T07:57:09Zen
dc.date.issued2008en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/3796en
dc.description.abstractCurrently biogeochemical models of the global ocean focus on simulating the coupling between prevalent physical conditions and the biogeochemical processes with the underlying assumption that coherent biological properties are a direct (or modulated) response to physics. This is one possible biogeographic characterisation of the pelagic environment, since biogeochemistry represents only one aspect of marine ecosystems. Several models are currently capable of simulating the chlorophyll distribution observed from space, though an objective validation with respect to relevant ecosystem properties is still lacking. In this paper we analyse the results of one of the most comprehensive models of ocean biogeochemistry with an emphasis on biogeographic validation sensu Longhurst (Ecological Geography of the Sea, 2007, 2nd edition, Academic Press). A set of multivariate statistical tools, Multi Dimensional Scaling (MDS) and Principal Components Analysis (PCA), are used to verify the existence of pre-defined biogeographic provinces and their statistical significance. The MDS ordination indicates that the given provinces are recognizable in the model on the basis of the selected variables. Analysis of Similarity (ANOSIM) shows that the provinces are statistically separable and they can be more easily distinguished in terms of their environmental features rather than their biology. The underlying relationships between the physical and biological properties are investigated through correlation analyses, thus providing some insights on how the model reproduces features characteristic of the various regions. Satellite chlorophyll data have been used to demonstrate external validation at the biogeographic level. The a priori provinces as characterised by chlorophyll values cannot be statistically separated in either the data or the model. It is likely this is related to the arbitrary choice of province boundaries, which are not necessarily the same as those derivable from non-interpolated SeaWiFS data. The PCA comparison of modelled and observed chlorophyll demonstrated some objective skill in the model as it generally captures the dominant mode of the data, although severe mismatch was identified in certain regions by visual comparison (Indian and Southern Oceans). The model also overestimated seasonal variability compared to the data. The method shows promise for helping overcome problems with model verification due to undersampling of most ocean biogeochemical variables.en
dc.description.sponsorshipEUR-OCEANS, CMCCen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.relation.ispartofDeep-sea Research Part Ien
dc.subjectBiogeochemical modelen
dc.subjectglobal oceanen
dc.subjectgeneral circulationen
dc.subjectERSEMen
dc.subjectPELAGOSen
dc.subjectBFMen
dc.subjectbiogeographyen
dc.titleBiogeographic validation of a global ocean biogeochemical modelen
dc.typemanuscripten
dc.description.statusSubmitteden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber1-51en
dc.subject.INGV03. Hydrosphere::03.01. General::03.01.01. Analytical and numerical modelingen
dc.subject.INGV03. Hydrosphere::03.01. General::03.01.07. Physical and biogeochemical interactionsen
dc.subject.INGV03. Hydrosphere::03.04. Chemical and biological::03.04.01. Biogeochemical cyclesen
dc.subject.INGV03. Hydrosphere::03.04. Chemical and biological::03.04.04. Ecosystemsen
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico3.7. Dinamica del clima e dell'oceanoen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextopenen
dc.contributor.authorVichi, M.en
dc.contributor.authorAllen, J. I.en
dc.contributor.authorHardman-Mountford, N.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentPML, UKen
dc.contributor.departmentPML, UKen
item.openairetypemanuscript-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptPML-
crisitem.author.deptPML, UK-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent03. Hydrosphere-
crisitem.classification.parent03. Hydrosphere-
crisitem.classification.parent03. Hydrosphere-
crisitem.classification.parent03. Hydrosphere-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Manuscripts
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
DSR1-S-08-00040.pdfManuscript923.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

156
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s) 20

412
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check