Earth-prints repository, logo   Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia

Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
 
|earth-prints home page | roma library | bologna library | catania library | milano library | napoli library | palermo library

Earth-prints >
Affiliation >
INGV >
Papers Published / Papers in press >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/3676

Share this record with your favourite social network:     Del.icio.us     Citeulike     Connotea
Facebook     Stumble it!     reddit    
Title: Underwater acoustic channel properties in the Gulf of Naples and their effects on digital data transmission
Authors: Stabile, T. A.*
Zollo, A.*
Vassallo, M.*
Iannaccone, G.*
Keywords: underwater acoustics
signal-to-noise ratio
shallow water
high frequency
Gulf of Naples
Issue Date: Jun-2007
Publisher: Editrice Compositori
Title of journal: Annals of Geophysics
Series/Report no.: 3 / 50 (2007)
Abstract: In this paper we studied the physical properties of the Gulf of Naples (Southern Italy) for its use as a communication channel for the acoustic transmission of digital data acquired by seismic instruments on the seafloor to a moored buoy. The acoustic link will be assured by high frequency acoustic modems operating with a central frequency of 100 kHz and a band pass of 10 kHz. Since the maximum depth of the sea is about 300 m and the planned horizontal distance between the seismic instruments and the buoy is 2 km, the acoustic data transmission shall be near horizontal. In this study the signal-to-noise ratio is plotted against depth and distance from the source, thus defining the limit after which the transmitted information becomes unreliable. Using ray-theory, we compute the amplitudes of a transmitted signal at a grid of 21×12 receivers to calculate the transmission loss at each receiver. The signal-to-noise ratio is finally computed for each receiver knowing also the transmitter source level and the acoustic noise level in the Gulf of Naples. The results show that the multipath effects predominate over the effects produced by the sound velocity gradient in the sea in the summer period. In the case of omnidirectional transmitters with a Source Level (SL) of 165 dB and a bit rate of 2.4 kbit/s, the results also show that distances of 1400-1600 m can be reached throughout the year for transmitter-receiver connections below 50 m depth in the underwater acoustic channel.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/3676
Appears in Collections:Annals of Geophysics
Papers Published / Papers in press
03.02.04. Measurements and monitoring

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
3stabile.pdf7.77MbAdobe PDFView/Open
  • ADAMS, A., O. HINTON, B. SHARIF, G. SALLES, N. ORR and
  • C. TSIMINEDES (2000): An experiment in sub-sea networks
  • – The LOTUS sea trials, in Proceedings of the
  • ECUA’00, Lyon, France.
  • AKYILDIZ, I.F., D. POMPILI and T. MELODIA (2005): Underwater
  • acoustic sensor networks: research challenges,
  • Ad Hoc Networks, 3 (3), 257-279.
  • BADIA, L., M. MASTROGIOVANNI, C. PETRIOLI, S. STEFANAKOS
  • and M. ZORZI (2006): An optimization framework for
  • joint sensor deployment, link scheduling and routing in
  • underwater sensor networks, in Proceedings of the First
  • ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks
  • (WUWNet’06), Los Angeles, California, U.S.A., 56-63.
  • BAGGEROER, A. (1984): Acoustic telemetry – An overview,
  • IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 9, 229-235.
  • BENSON, B., G. CHANG, D. MANOV, B. GRAHAM and R.
  • KASTNER (2006): Design of a low-cost acoustic modem
  • for moored oceanographic applications, in Proceedings
  • of the First ACM International Workshop on Underwater
  • Networks (WUWNet’06), Los Angeles, California,
  • U.S.A., 71-78.
  • CATIPOVIC, J.A. (1990): Performance limitations in underwater
  • acoustic telemetry, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 15, 205-216.
  • CAZZOLATO, B.S., P. NELSON, P. JOSEPH and R.J. BRIND
  • (2001): Numerical simulation of optimal deconvolution
  • in a shallow-water environment, J. Acoust. Soc.
  • Am., 110, 170-185.
  • CHEN, C.T. and F.J. MILLERO (1977): Speed of sound in seawater
  • at high pressure, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 62, 1129-
  • 1135.
  • COATES, R.F.W. (1990): Underwater Acoustic Systems (John
  • Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York), pp. 188.
  • COATES, R.F.W. (1993): Underwater acoustic communications,
  • in Proceeding of OCEANS ‘93, Victoria, Canada,
  • III.420-III.425.
  • COPPENS, A.B. (1981): Simple equations for the speed of
  • sound in Neptunian waters, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 69,
  • 862-863.
  • DAHL, P.H. (2004): The sea surface bounce channel. Bubble-
  • medianted energy loss and time/angle spreading, in
  • High Frequency Ocean Acoustics, edited by M.
  • PORTER, M. SIDERIUS and W. KUPERMAN (American Institute
  • of Physics), 194-203.
  • DE DOMINICIS ROTONDI, A. (1990): Principi di Elettroacustica
  • Subacquea (Ed. ELSAG, Genova), vol. I, pp. 422.
  • DE DOMINICIS ROTONDI, A. (1995): Principi di Elettroacustica
  • Subacquea. Le Caratterizzazioni dell’Smbiente
  • Operativo Marino (Edizioni Scriba), vol. II, pp. 256.
  • DE DOMINICIS ROTONDI, A. (1996): Principi di Elettroacustica
  • Subacquea. Il Canale Acustico Marino (Edizioni
  • Scriba), vol. III, pp. 512.
  • DEL GROSSO, V.A. (1974): New equation for the speed of
  • sound in natural waters (with comparisons to other
  • equations), J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 56, 1084-1091.
  • FARRA, V. and R. MADARIAGA (1987): Seismic waveform
  • modeling in heterogeneous media by ray perturbation
  • theory, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 2697-2712.
  • FISHER, F.H. and V.P. SIMMONS (1977): Sound absorption in
  • sea water, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 62, 558-564.
  • HAMILTON, E.L. (1978): Sound velocity gradients in marine
  • sediments, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 65, 909-922.
  • HAMILTON, E. L. (1979): Vp/Vs and Poisson’s ratios in marine
  • sediments and rocks, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 66, 1093-1101.
  • HAMILTON, E.L. (1980): Geoacoustic modeling of the sea
  • floor, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 68, 1313-1340.
  • JAFFE, J. and C. SCHURGERS (2006): Sensor networks of
  • freely drifting autonomous underwater explorers, in
  • Proceedings of the First ACM International Workshop
  • on Underwater Networks (WUWNet’06), Los Angeles,
  • California, U.S.A., 93-96.
  • JENSEN, F.B.,W.A. KUPERMAN, M.B. PORTER and H. SCHMIDT
  • (2000): Computational Ocean Acoustics (Springer-Verlag),
  • pp. 600.
  • KINSLER, L.E., A.R. FREY, A.B. COPPENS and J.V. SANDERS
  • (2000): Fundamentals of Acoustics (John Wiley &
  • Sons Ldt., New York), 4th edition, pp. 560.
  • KNUDSEN, V.O., R.S. ALFORD and J.W. EMLING (1948): Underwater
  • ambient noise, J. Mar. Res., 22, 410-429.
  • MACKENZIE, K.V. (1981): Nine-term equation for the sound
  • speed in the oceans, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 70, 807-812.
  • NELDER, J.A. and R. MEAD (1965): A simplex method for
  • function minimization, Comput. J., 7, 308-313.
  • POMPILI, D., T. MELODIA and I.F. AKYILDIZ (2006): Deployment
  • analysis in underwater acoustic wireless sensor
  • networks, in Proceedings of the First ACM International
  • Workshop on Underwater Networks (WUWNet’06),
  • Los Angeles, California, U.S.A., 48-55.
  • PREISIG, J. (2006): Acoustic propagation considerations for
  • underwater acoustic communications network development,
  • in Proceedings of the First ACM International
  • Workshop on Underwater Networks (WUWNet’06),
  • Los Angeles, California, U.S.A., 1-5.
  • PRESS, W.H., S.A. TEUKOLSKY, W.T. VETTERLING and B.P.
  • FLANNERY (2003): Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: the
  • Art of Scientific Computing (Cambridge University
  • Press), 2nd edition, pp. 992 (available online at: <http://
  • www.nr.com>).
  • SHANNON, C.E. (1948): A mathematical theory of communication,
  • Bell System Technical J., 27, 379-423, 623-656.
  • SMITH, K.B., A.A.M. ABRANTES and A. LARRAZA (2003):
  • Examination of time-reversal acoustics in shallow water
  • and applications to noncoherent underwater communications,
  • J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 113, 3095-3110.
  • SOZER, EM., M. STOJANOVIC and J. G. PROAKIS (2000): Underwater
  • acoustic networks, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 25,
  • 72-83.
  • STOJANOVIC, M. (1996): Recent advances in high-speed underwater
  • acoustic communications, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng.,
  • 21, 125-136.
  • STOJANOVIC, M. (2004): Refocusing techniques for high rate
  • acoustic communications, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 117,
  • 1173-1185.
  • STOJANOVIC, M. (2006): On the relationship between capacity
  • and distance in an underwater acoustic communication
  • channel, in Proceedings of the First ACM International
  • Workshop on Underwater Networks (WUWNet’06), Los
  • Angeles, California, U.S.A., 41-47.
  • STOJANOVIC, M., J.A. CATIPOVIC and J.G. PROAKIS (1993):
  • Adaptive multichannel combining and equalization for
  • underwater acoustic communications, J. Acoust. Soc.
  • Am., 94, 1621-1631.
  • STOJANOVIC, M., J.A. CATIPOVIC and J.G. PROAKIS (1994):
  • Phase coherent digital communications for underwater
  • acoustic channels, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 19, 100-111.
  • STOJANOVIC, M., J.A. CATIPOVIC and J.G. PROAKIS (1995):
  • Reduced complexity spatial and temporal processing
  • of underwater acoustic communication signals, J.
  • Acoust. Soc. Am., 98, 961-672.
  • THORP,W.H. (1967): Analytic description of the low-frequency
  • attenuation coefficient, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 42, p. 270.
  • URICK, R.J. (1986): Ambient Noise in the Sea (Peninsula
  • Publishing), pp. 205.
  • WENZ, G.M. (1962): Acoustic ambient noise in the ocean:
  • spectra and sources, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 34, 1936-1956.
  • WONG, G.S.K. and S. ZHU (1995): Speed of sound in seawater
  • as a function of salinity, temperature and pressure,
  • J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 97, 1732-1736.

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! ICT Support, development & maintenance are provided by theAePIC team @CILEA.Powered onDSpace Software. Feedback