Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/2958
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallBarker, P. F.; Threshers Barn, Whitcott Keysett, Clun, Shropshire SY7 8QE, UKen
dc.contributor.authorallFilippelli, G. M.; Department of Earth Sciences, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), Indianapolis, IN 46202-5132, USAen
dc.contributor.authorallFlorindo, F.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallMartin, E. E.; Department of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-2120, USAen
dc.contributor.authorallHoward, D. S.; Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14611, USAen
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-06T08:04:47Zen
dc.date.available2007-12-06T08:04:47Zen
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/2958en
dc.description.abstractFor some time, onset of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) was considered to have caused or stabilised full Antarctic glaciation. Recently, however, the importance of the ACC in this role has been questioned. In order to understand the relationship between the ACC and Antarctic glaciation, and thence the importance of ocean circulation to palaeoclimate, we need to determine the development history of both processes. To this end, we summarise all published estimates of ACC onset. The time of onset, of shallow circulation or deep, is uncertain, whether based on tectonic studies or the interpretation of changes in the sediment record. Two potential final barriers to circumpolar flow have been identified; south of Tasmania and south of South America. The former is well constrained by tectonics and marine geology to before 32Ma for a deep gap, with a shallow gap in place by 35.5Ma at the latest. These ages fit nicely with the onset of full Antarctic glaciation at 33–34 Ma, although some workers question the causality. Estimates of the time of opening of the latter range widely, whether based on tectonics or sedimentary geology, from as recently as 6Ma to as early as 41 Ma, with the gap depth uncertain also. Resolution of the tectonics-based uncertainties by additional survey being most probably both time-consuming and inconclusive, and the geological estimates being open to alternative interpretations, we define an optimal strategy for additional sampling and measurement, designed to resolve the time of onset more certainly, possibly also resolving between deep and shallow opening, and thereby constraining the ACC role. Sample sites would have to be close to likely final barriers, to avoid extraneous influence, and within modern zones of ACC influence, ideally would form a depth transect, and would have continuous, mixed terrigenous and biogenic sections. A wide range of carefully selected parameters would be measured at each.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofDeep-Sea Research IIen
dc.relation.ispartofseries/ 54 (2007)en
dc.subjectAntarctic Circumpolar Currenten
dc.subjectPalaeoclimateen
dc.subjectDrake Passageen
dc.titleOnset and role of the Antarctic Circumpolar Currenten
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber2388–2398en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.04. Geology::04.04.99. General or miscellaneousen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.07.028en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico2.2. Laboratorio di paleomagnetismoen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextreserveden
dc.contributor.authorBarker, P. F.en
dc.contributor.authorFilippelli, G. M.en
dc.contributor.authorFlorindo, F.en
dc.contributor.authorMartin, E. E.en
dc.contributor.authorHoward, D. S.en
dc.contributor.departmentThreshers Barn, Whitcott Keysett, Clun, Shropshire SY7 8QE, UKen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Earth Sciences, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), Indianapolis, IN 46202-5132, USAen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-2120, USAen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14611, USAen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptThreshers Barn, Whitcott Keysett, Clun, Shropshire SY7 8QE, UK-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Earth Sciences, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), Indianapolis, IN 46202-5132, USA-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione AC, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-2120, USA-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14611, USA-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-3434-5982-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6058-9748-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
Barker et al., 2007.pdf720.5 kBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 10

82
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s)

134
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s)

27
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric