Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/2785
AuthorsPezzopane, M.* 
Scotto, C.* 
TitleAutomatic scaling of critical frequency foF2 and MUF(3000)F2: A comparison between Autoscala and ARTIST 4.5 on Rome data
Issue DateJul-2007
Series/Report no.42 (2007)
DOI10.1029/2006RS003581
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/2785
KeywordsIonograms
ARTIST
Autoscala
Subject Classification01. Atmosphere::01.02. Ionosphere::01.02.99. General or miscellaneous 
01. Atmosphere::01.02. Ionosphere::01.02.05. Wave propagation 
01. Atmosphere::01.02. Ionosphere::01.02.06. Instruments and techniques 
AbstractThe performances of Autoscala and ARTIST 4.5 were comparatively evaluated using a large database of 6098 ionograms recorded from September 2005 to June 2006 by the digisonde DPS4 at the Rome ionospheric station. Results of comparisons between automatically and manually scaled data are shown for both programs highlighting the different behaviours. The Autoscala and ARTIST 4.5 values of foF2 and MUF(3000)F2 both agree with the hand-scaled values for ~95% of ionograms. For the other ~5% of ionograms, which the manual scaler classed as unscalable, ARTIST 4.5 usually gave invalid results, whereas Autoscala usually gave no result. The data recorded by the ionosondes DPS4 (interpreted by ARTIST 4.5) and AIS-INGV (interpreted by Autoscala) during 3 geomagnetic storms were also analysed. Ionograms with typical errors both for Autoscala and ARTIST 4.5 are displayed.
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2006RS003581.pdfFull Article933 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

312
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Jun 23, 2017

Download(s)

72
checked on Jun 23, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric