Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/1779
AuthorsAmato, A.* 
Azzara, R.* 
Basili, A.* 
Chiarabba, C.* 
Cocco, M.* 
Di Bona, M.* 
Selvaggi, G.* 
TitleMain shock and aftershocks of the December 13, 1990, Eastern Sicily earthquake
Issue DateMay-1995
Series/Report no.38/2
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/1779
Keywordsseismicity
focal mechanisms
local networks
Eastern Sicily earthquake
Subject Classification04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.05. Historical seismology 
Abstractn this paper we describe the location and the fault plane solution of the December 13, 1990, Eastern Sicily earthquake (ML = 5.4), and of its aftershock sequence. Because the main shock location is not well constrained due to the geometry of the permanent National Seismic Network in this area, we used a "master event" algorithm to locate it in relation to a well located aftershock. The revised location is slightly offshore Eastern Sicily, 4.8 km north of the largest aftershock (ML = 4.6) that occurred on December 16, 1990. The main shock has a strike-slip mechanism, indicating SE-NW compression with either left lateral motion on a NS plane, or right lateral on an EW plane. Two days after the main event we deployed a local network of eight digital stations, that provided accurate locations of the aftershocks, and the estimate of source parameters for the strongest earthquake. We observed an unusual quiescence after the ML = 5.4 event, that lasted until December 16, when a ML = 4.6 earthquake occurred. The fault plane solution of this aftershock shows normal faulting on E-W trending planes. Between December 16 and January 6, 1991, a sequence of at least 300 aftershock" was recorded by the local network. The well located earthquakes define a small source region of approximately 5 x 2 x 5 km3, with hypocentral depths ranging between 15 and 20 km. The paucity of large aftershocks, the time gap between the main shock occurrence and the beginning of the aftershock sequence (3.5 days), their different focal mechanisms (strike-slip vs. normal), and the different stress drop between main shock and after- shock suggest that the ML = 5.4 earthquake is an isolated event. The sequence of aftershocks began with the ML = 4.6 event, which is probably linked to the main shock with a complex mechanism of stress redistribution after the main faulting episode.
Appears in Collections:Manuscripts
Annals of Geophysics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
09 amato.pdf3.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

90
checked on Apr 29, 2017

Download(s)

191
checked on Apr 29, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check