Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/1719
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallMoroni, A.; Istituto di Ricerca sul Rischio Sismico, C.N.R., Milano, Italyen
dc.contributor.authorallMonachesi, G.; Osservatorio Geofisico Sperimenlale, Macerata, ltalyen
dc.contributor.authorallAlbarello, D.; Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Siena. ltalyen
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-21T14:55:52Zen
dc.date.available2006-09-21T14:55:52Zen
dc.date.issued1996-10en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/1719en
dc.description.abstractA major problem in assessing macroseismic intensity from historical records is the lack of a standardized procedure for processing documentary sources and supplying unequivocal intensity estimates. In fact, most macroseismic, scales do not include detailed descriptions of procedures for intensity assessment and many divergent interpretations of intensity values arc obtained by different operators. In order to disclose these problems an experiment was made in Italy in 1994, in the framework of GNDT "Seismicity" Working Group. A set of selected documents concerning origil1al descriptions of effects produced by earthquakes which had occurred in Italy from 15th to 20th century, was supplied to a number of independent researchers. Each of them was invited to assess on this basis the intensity values and to explain his intellectual path by describing it in detail. This documentation was finally collected and, during a meeting devoted to this topic, the researchers involved were invited to discuss their personal experiences. The discussion indicated that the discrepancies between the estimate obtained by the different authors from the same documentary source are, in many cases, greater than 1 degree. This implies that the effect of personal choices may play an important role in intensity assessment and makes intensity estimates performed by the different authors less comparable. At present no definitive conclusions about these problems can be drawn but the topics focused during the meeting may represent a useful basis for a wider discussion to define a standardized procedure for thc assessment of intensity from documentary data.en
dc.format.extent3259231 bytesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.relation.ispartofseries5/39 (1996)en
dc.subjectEarthquakeen
dc.subjectmacroseismic scalesen
dc.subjecthistorical recordsen
dc.titleIntensity assessment from documentary data. Criteria and procedures in the daily practice of seismologistsen
dc.typearticleen
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.10. Instruments and techniquesen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextopenen
dc.contributor.authorMoroni, A.en
dc.contributor.authorMonachesi, G.en
dc.contributor.authorAlbarello, D.en
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto di Ricerca sul Rischio Sismico, C.N.R., Milano, Italyen
dc.contributor.departmentOsservatorio Geofisico Sperimenlale, Macerata, ltalyen
dc.contributor.departmentDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Siena. ltalyen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptDipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell’Ambiente, University of Siena-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9226-4681-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
Appears in Collections:Annals of Geophysics
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
06 moroni.pdf3.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

154
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s) 50

265
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check