Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/11734
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-20T09:50:59Zen
dc.date.available2018-04-20T09:50:59Zen
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/11734en
dc.description.abstractVolume determination of tephra deposits is necessary for the assessment of the dynamics and hazards of explosive volcanoes. Several methods have been proposed during the past 40 years that include the analysis of crystal concentration of large pumices, integrations of various thinning relationships, and the inversion of field observations using analytical and computational models. Regardless of their strong dependence on tephra-deposit exposure and distribution of isomass/isopach contours, empirical integrations of deposit thinning trends still represent the most widely adopted strategy due to their practical and fast application. The most recent methods involve the best fitting of thinning data using various exponential seg- ments or a power-law curve on semilog plots of thickness (or mass/area) versus square root of isopach area. The exponential method is mainly sensitive to the number and the choice of straight segments, whereas the power-law method can better reproduce the natural thinning of tephra deposits but is strongly sensitive to the proximal or distal extreme of integration. We analyze a large data set of tephra deposits and propose a new empirical method for the deter- mination of tephra-deposit volumes that is based on the integration of the Weibull function. The new method shows a better agreement with observed data, reconciling the debate on the use of the exponential versus power-law method. In fact, the Weibull best fitting only depends on three free parameters, can well reproduce the gradual thinning of tephra deposits, and does not depend on the choice of arbitrary segments or of arbitrary extremes of integration.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.relation.ispartofGeologyen
dc.relation.ispartofseries/40 (2012)en
dc.titleEstimating the volume of tephra deposits: A new simple strategyen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.description.pagenumber415-418en
dc.identifier.doi10.1130/G32769.1en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico5V. Dinamica dei processi eruttivi e post-eruttivien
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico6V. Pericolosità vulcanica e contributi alla stima del rischioen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.contributor.authorBonadonna, Costanzaen
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Antonioen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione OV, Napoli, Italiaen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2368-2193-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4987-6471-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
boncos2012.pdf283.61 kBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 5

127
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s)

53
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s)

8
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric