Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/10803
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-27T08:08:23Zen
dc.date.available2018-02-27T08:08:23Zen
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/10803en
dc.description.abstractIs Europe-wide operational earthquake forecasting (OEF) possible? We discuss the myriad problems that prevent it today, many of which relate to heterogeneities in earthquake recording, processing, and reporting. We contemplate the difficulty of building models that cross political boundaries, and we consider the prospect of European OEF in light of recent efforts to harmonize long-term seismic hazard assessment among several nations. Emphasizing the Strategies and Tools for Real-time Earthquake Risk Reduction (REAKT) project, we report achievements related to short-term seismicity forecasting in Iceland and Italy that could apply elsewhere in Europe. In Iceland, collaboration fostered by REAKT resulted in a revised earthquake catalog and a prototype OEF system. We report results from an experiment conducted with this prototype; these results suggest ensemble models provide an information gain, updating models more frequently improves their forecast skill, and that OEF is computationally feasible. In Italy, REAKT supported the creation of an ensemble model that now issues weekly hazard forecasts. We present examples of these forecasts, highlighting the problem that OEF often yields low probabilities, which are difficult to interpret and convert into actionable decisions. Motivated by such low hazard probabilities, we highlight Europe’s pioneering efforts in operational earthquake loss forecasting and mention solutions to problems that currently prevent OEF at the European scale.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameSpringeren
dc.relation.ispartofBulletin of Earthquake Engineeringen
dc.relation.ispartofseries/14 (2016)en
dc.titleOperational earthquake forecasting in Europe: progress, despite challengesen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber2459-2469en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10518-016-9930-7en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico5T. Modelli di pericolosità sismica e da maremotoen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.contributor.authorZechar, Jeremyen
dc.contributor.authorMarzocchi, Warneren
dc.contributor.authorWiemer, Stefanen
dc.contributor.departmentETH Zurichen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentETH Zurichen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptETH Zurich-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9114-1516-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
BEE_Zechar_etal_2016.pdf1.27 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on Feb 7, 2021

Page view(s)

60
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Download(s)

1
checked on Apr 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric