Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/10636
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-21T11:41:02Zen
dc.date.available2017-11-21T11:41:02Zen
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/10636en
dc.description.abstractLarge geophysical datasets are produced routinely during airborne surveys. The Spatially Constrained Inversion (SCI) is capable of inverting these datasets in an efficient and effective way by using a 1D forward modeling and, at the same time, enforcing smoothness constraints between the model parameters. The smoothness constraints act both vertically within each 1D model discretizing the investigated volume and laterally between the adjacent soundings. Even if the traditional, smooth SCI has been proven to be very successful in reconstructing complex structures, sometimes it generates results where the formation boundaries are blurred and poorly match the real, abrupt changes in the underlying geology. Recently, to overcome this problem, the original (smooth) SCI algorithm has been extended to include sharp boundary reconstruction capabilities based on the Minimum Support regularization. By means of minimization of the volume where, the spatial model variation is non-vanishing (i.e., the support of the variation), sharp-SCI promotes the reconstruction of blocky solutions. In this paper, we apply the novel sharp-SCI method to different types of airborne electromagnetic datasets and, by comparing the models against other geophysical and geological evidences, demonstrate the improved capabilities of in reconstructing sharp features.en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries1/22 (2017)en
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/en
dc.subjectsharp inversionen
dc.subjectAEM data modellingen
dc.subjectconstrained inversionen
dc.titleExamples of Improved Inversion of Different Airborne Electromagnetic Datasets Via Sharp Regularizationen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber51-61en
dc.subject.INGV05.01. Computational geophysicsen
dc.identifier.doi10.2113/jeeg22.1.51en
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico1VV. Altroen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.contributor.authorVignoli, Giulioen
dc.contributor.authorSapia, Vincenzoen
dc.contributor.authorMenghini, Antonioen
dc.contributor.authorViezzoli, Andreaen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italiaen
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3437-5826-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1958-2314-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent05. General-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Vignoli_JEEG_2017.pdf2.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

20
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s)

225
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Download(s) 50

1,003
checked on Apr 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric