Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/10302
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorallWoessner, J.; Department of Earth Science, ETH Zurichen
dc.contributor.authorallDanciu, L.; Department of Earth Science, ETH Zurichen
dc.contributor.authorallGiardini, D.; Department of Earth Science, ETH Zurichen
dc.contributor.authorallCrowley, H.; European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering (EUCENTRE)en
dc.contributor.authorallCotton, F.; Laboratoire de Géophysique Interne et Tectonophysique, Université Joseph Fourieren
dc.contributor.authorallGrünthal, G.; Seismic Hazard and Stress Field, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciencesen
dc.contributor.authorallValensise, G.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallArvidsson, R.; Seismic Hazard and Stress Field, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciencesen
dc.contributor.authorallBasili, R.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallDemircioglu, M. B.; Earthquake Research Institute, Kandilli Observatory, Bogazici Universityen
dc.contributor.authorallHiemer, S.; Department of Earth Science, ETH Zurichen
dc.contributor.authorallMeletti, C.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallMusson, R. W.; British Geological Surveyen
dc.contributor.authorallRovida, A. N.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.authorallSesetyan, K.; Earthquake Research Institute, Kandilli Observatory, Bogazici Universityen
dc.contributor.authorallStucchi, M.; European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering (EUCENTRE)en
dc.contributor.authorallThe SHARE Consortiumen
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-09T06:06:32Zen
dc.date.available2016-05-09T06:06:32Zen
dc.date.issued2015-12en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/10302en
dc.description.abstractThe 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM13) results from a community-based probabilistic seismic hazard assessment supported by the EU-FP7 project “Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe” (SHARE, 2009–2013). The ESHM13 is a consistent seismic hazard model for Europe and Turkey which overcomes the limitation of national borders and includes a through quantification of the uncertainties. It is the first completed regional effort contributing to the “Global Earthquake Model” initiative. It might serve as a reference model for various applications, from earthquake preparedness to earthquake risk mitigation strategies, including the update of the European seismic regulations for building design (Eurocode 8), and thus it is useful for future safety assessment and improvement of private and public buildings. Although its results constitute a reference for Europe, they do not replace the existing national design regulations that are in place for seismic design and construction of buildings. The ESHM13 represents a significant improvement compared to previous efforts as it is based on (1) the compilation of updated and harmonised versions of the databases required for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment, (2) the adoption of standard procedures and robust methods, especially for expert elicitation and consensus building among hundreds of European experts, (3) the multi-disciplinary input from all branches of earthquake science and engineering, (4) the direct involvement of the CEN/TC250/SC8 committee in defining output specifications relevant for Eurocode 8 and (5) the accounting for epistemic uncertainties of model components and hazard results. Furthermore, enormous effort was devoted to transparently document and ensure open availability of all data, results and methods through the European Facility for Earthquake Hazard and Risk (www.​efehr.​org).en
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisher.nameSpringer Science+Business Media B.V.en
dc.relation.ispartofBulletin of Earthquake Engineeringen
dc.relation.ispartofseries12/13(2015)en
dc.subjectProbabilistic seismic hazard assessmenten
dc.subjectUncertainty analysisen
dc.subjectEarthquake engineeringen
dc.subjectLogic-treeen
dc.titleThe 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model: key components and resultsen
dc.typearticleen
dc.description.statusPublisheden
dc.type.QualityControlPeer-revieweden
dc.description.pagenumber3553-3596en
dc.identifier.URLhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-015-9795-1en
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.06. Seismology::04.06.11. Seismic risken
dc.subject.INGV04. Solid Earth::04.07. Tectonophysics::04.07.07. Tectonicsen
dc.subject.INGV05. General::05.02. Data dissemination::05.02.02. Seismological dataen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10518-015-9795-1en
dc.relation.referencesAkkar S, Bommer JJ (2010) Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East. Seismol Res Lett 81:195–206. doi:10.​1785/​gssrl.​81.​2.​195 CrossRef Akkar S, Sandıkkaya MA, Şenyurt M et al (2013) Reference database for seismic ground-motion in Europe (RESORCE). Bull Earthq Eng 12:311–339. doi:10.​1007/​s10518-013-9506-8 CrossRef Anderson JG, Luco JE (1983) Consequences of slip rate constraints on earthquake occurrence relations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:471–496 Arvidsson R, Grünthal G (2010) SHARE D3.1—compilation of existing regional and national seismic source zones. Bruxelles Asch K (2005) The 1:5 million International Geological Map of Europe and adjacent areas. In: BGR, Hann. http://​www.​bgr.​de/​karten/​igme5000/​igme5000.​htm Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2003) Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction-zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1703–1729 CrossRef Basili R, Kastelic V, Valensise G, Group and the DW (2009) DISS3 tutorial series: guidelines for compiling records of the database of the individual seismogenic sources, version 3. INGV Basili R, Valensise G, Vannoli P et al (2008) The Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS), version 3: summarizing 20 years of research on Italy’s earthquake geology. Tectonophysics 453:20–43. doi:10.​1016/​j.​tecto.​2007.​04.​014 CrossRef Basili R, Tiberti MM, Kastelic V et al (2013) Integrating geologic fault data into tsunami hazard studies. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:1025–1050. doi:10.​5194/​nhess-13-1025-2013 CrossRef Bassin C, Laske G, Masters G (2000) The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography. EOS Trans AGU 81:F987 Beauval C, Bard P-Y, Hainzl S, Gueguen P (2008) Can strong-motion observations be used to constrain probabilistic seismic-hazard estimates? Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:509–520. doi:10.​1785/​0120070006 CrossRef Berryman K, Wallace L, Hayes G, et al. (2013) The GEM faulted earth subduction characterisation project (version 1.0) Bird P (2003) An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochem. Geophys Geosyst 4:n/a–n/a. doi:10.​1029/​2001GC000252 Bisch P, Carvalho E, Degree H et al (2011) Eurocode 8: seismic design of buildings worked examples. doi:10.​2788/​91658 Bommer JJ, Scherbaum F (2008) The use and misuse of logic trees in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Earthq Spectra 24:997–1009. doi:10.​1193/​1.​2977755 CrossRef Bommer JJ, Douglas J, Scherbaum F et al (2010) On the selection of ground-motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis. Seismol Res Lett 81:783–793. doi:10.​1785/​gssrl.​81.​5.​783 CrossRef Budnitz RJ, Apostolakis G, Boore DM et al (1997) Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: guidance on uncertainty and use of experts. Report NUREG/CR-6372, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, sponsored by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, U.S. Department of Energy, and Electric Power Research Institute Bungum H (2007) Numerical modelling of fault activities. Comput Geosci 33:808–820. doi:10.​1016/​j.​cageo.​2006.​10.​011 CrossRef Burkhard M, Grünthal G (2009) Seismic source zone characterization for the seismic hazard assessment project PEGASOS by the Expert Group 2 (EG1b). Swiss J Geosci 102:149–188. doi:10.​1007/​s00015-009-1307-3 CrossRef Campbell KW (2003) Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground-motion (attenuation) relations in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1012–1033. doi:10.​1785/​0120020002 CrossRef Caputo R, Chatzipetros A, Pavlides S, Sboras S (2012) Active tectonics around the Mediterranean The Greek Database of Seismogenic Sources (GreDaSS): state-of-the-art for northern Greece. Ann Geophys. doi:10.​4401/​ag-5168 Caputo R, Chatzipetros A, Pavlides S, Sboras S (2013) The Greek Database of Seismogenic Sources (GreDaSS): state-of-the-art for northern Greece. Ann Geophys. doi:10.​4401/​ag-5168 Cauzzi C, Faccioli E (2008) Broadband (0.05 to 20 s) prediction of displacement response spectra based on worldwide digital records. J Seismol 12:453–475. doi:10.​1007/​s10950-008-9098-y CrossRef CEN (2004) CEN—Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, EN 1998-1. Brussels, Belgium Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2008) An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 24:173–215. doi:10.​1193/​1.​2894832 CrossRef Coppersmith KJ, Salomone LA, Fuller CW et al (2012) Technical report: central and eastern United States seismic source characterization for nuclear facilities, chapter 5. Palo Alto, CA, USA Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583–1606 Cotton F, Scherbaum F, Bommer JJ, Bungum H (2006) Criteria for selecting and adjusting ground-motion models for specific target regions: application to central Europe and rock sites. J Seismol 10:137–156. doi:10.​1007/​s10950-005-9006-7 CrossRef Delavaud E, Cotton F, Akkar S et al (2012) Toward a ground-motion logic tree for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Europe. J Seismol 16:451–473. doi:10.​1007/​s10950-012-9281-z CrossRef Demircioglu M, Siyahi B, Erdik M et al (2004) Earthquake hazard in Marmara Region, Turkey. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24:605–631. doi:10.​1016/​j.​soildyn.​2004.​04.​003 CrossRef DISS Working Group (2010) Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS). doi:10.​6092/​INGV.​IT-DISS3.​1.​1 Dominique P, Andre E (2012) Probabilistic seismic hazard map on the French national territory. In: Proceedings of 12 world conference on earthquake engineering Dziewonski AM, Chou T-A, Woodhouse JH (1981) Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity. J Geophys Res 86:2825. doi:10.​1029/​JB086iB04p02825 CrossRef Edwards B, Fäh D (2013) A stochastic ground-motion model for Switzerland. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:78–98. doi:10.​1785/​0120110331 CrossRef England P, Jackson J (2011) Uncharted seismic risk. Nat Geosci 4:348–349. doi:10.​1038/​ngeo1168 CrossRef Ergintav S, Reilinger RE, Çakmak R et al (2014) Istanbul’s earthquake hot spots: geodetic constraints on strain accumulation along faults in the Marmara seismic gap. Geophys Res Lett 41:5783–5788. doi:10.​1002/​2014GL060985 CrossRef Faccioli E, Bianchini A, Villani M (2010) New ground motion prediction equations for t > 1 s and their influence on seismic hazard assessment. In: Proceedings of the University of Tokyo symposium on long-period ground motion and urban disaster mitigation Field EH, Dawson TE, Felzer KR et al (2009) Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2). Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:2053–2107. doi:10.​1785/​0120080049 CrossRef Fonseca JFBD (2006) The source of the Lisbon earthquake. Science 308:50–51 CrossRef Frankel A (1995) Mapping seismic hazard in the central and eastern United States. Seismol Res Lett 66:8 CrossRef Frankel AD, Petersen MD, Mueller CS, et al. (2002) Documentation for the 2002 update of the national seismic hazard maps Garcia D, Wald DJ, Hearne MG (2012) A global earthquake discrimination scheme to optimize ground-motion prediction equation selection. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:185–203. doi:10.​1785/​0120110124 CrossRef Garcia-Mayordomo J, Insua-Arévalo JM, Martínez-Díaz JJ et al (2012) The Quaternary Active Faults Database of Iberia (QAFI v. 2.0). J Iber Geol 38:285–302 CrossRef Giardini D (1999) The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP)—1992/1999. Ann di Geofis 42:957–974. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-3121.​1992.​tb00609.​x Giardini D, Woessner J, Danciu L et al (2013a) Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe (SHARE): online data resource. doi:10.​12686/​SED-00000001-SHARE Giardini D, Woessner J, Danciu L et al (2013b) SHARE European seismic hazard map for peak ground acceleration, 10 % exceedance probability in 50 years. doi:10.​2777/​30345 Giardini D, Woessner J, Danciu L (2014) Mapping Europe’s seismic hazard. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 95:261–268. doi:10.​1002/​2014EO29 CrossRef Gomez-Capera AA, Rovida A, Gasperini P et al (2014) The determination of earthquake location and magnitude from macroseismic data in Europe. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.​1007/​s10518-014-9672-3 Grünthal G, GSHAP Working Group Region 3 (1999) Seismic hazard assessment for Central, North and Northwest Europe: GSHAP Region 3. Ann di Geofis 42 Grünthal G, Wahlström R (2000) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (horizontal PGA) for Sweden, Finland and Denmark using different logic tree approaches. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 20:45–58 CrossRef Grünthal G, Wahlström R (2012) The European-Mediterranean Earthquake Catalogue (EMEC) for the last millennium. J Seismol 16:535–570. doi:10.​1007/​s10950-012-9302-y CrossRef Grünthal G, Mayer-Rosa D, Lenhardt W (1998) Abschätzung der Erdbebengefährdung für die D-A-CH-Staaten. Bautechnik 75:753–767 CrossRef Grünthal G, Wahlström R, Stromeyer D (2013) The SHARE European Earthquake Catalogue (SHEEC) for the time period 1900–2006 and its comparison to the European-Mediterranean Earthquake Catalogue (EMEC). J Seismol 17:1339–1344. doi:10.​1007/​s10950-013-9379-y CrossRef Haller KM, Basili R (2011) Developing seismogenic source models based on geologic fault data. Seismol Res Lett 82:519–525. doi:10.​1785/​gssrl.​82.​4.​519 CrossRef Hanks TC, Bakun WH (2002) A bilinear source-scaling model for M-log A observations of continental earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:1841–1846. doi:10.​1785/​0120010148 CrossRef Hiemer S, Jackson DD, Wang Q et al (2013) A stochastic forecast of California earthquakes based on fault slip and smoothed seismicity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:799–810. doi:10.​1785/​0120120168 CrossRef Hiemer S, Woessner J, Basili R et al (2014) A kernel-smoothed stochastic earthquake rate model considering seismicity and fault moment release for Europe. Geophys J Int 198:in review. doi:10.​1093/​gji/​ggu186 Holschneider M, Zöller G, Clements R, Schorlemmer D (2014) Can we test for the maximum possible earthquake magnitude? J Geophys Res Solid Earth. doi:10.​1002/​2013JB010319 Jimenez MJ, Giardini D, Grünthal G et al (2001) Unified seismic hazard modelling throughout the Mediterranean region. Boll Di Geofis Teor Ed Appl 42:3–18 Johnston AC, Coppersmith KJ, Kanter LR, Cornell CA (1994) The earthquakes of stable continental regions, volume 1: assessment of large earthquake potential. Electric Power Research Institute, USA Kagan YY (2002) Aftershock zone scaling. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:641–655. doi:10.​1785/​0120010172 CrossRef Kagan YY, Jackson DD, Geller RJ (2012) Characteristic earthquake model, 1884–2011, R.I.P. Seismol Res Lett 83:951–953. doi:10.​1785/​0220120107 CrossRef Krammerer AM, Ake JP (2011) Practical implementation guidelines for SSHAC level 3 and 4 hazard studies (NUREG-2117) Kulkarni RB, Youngs RR, Coppersmith KJ (1984) Assessment of confidence intervals for results of seismic hazard analysis. In: Proceedings of the eighth world conference on earthquake engineering, San Francisco, pp 263–270 Lemoine A, Douglas J, Cotton F (2012) Testing the applicability of correlations between topographic slope and vs30 for Europe. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:2585–2599. doi:10.​1785/​0120110240 CrossRef Leonard M (2010) Earthquake fault scaling: self-consistent relating of rupture length, width, average displacement, and moment release. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:1971–1988. doi:10.​1785/​0120090189 CrossRef Lin P-S, Lee C-T (2008) Ground-motion attenuation relationships for subduction-zone earthquakes in northeastern Taiwan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:220–240. doi:10.​1785/​0120060002 CrossRef Locati M, Rovida A, Albini P, Stucchi M (2014) The AHEAD portal: a gateway to European historical earthquake data. Seismol Res Lett 85:727–734. doi:10.​1785/​0220130113 CrossRef Meletti C, Galadini F, Valensise G et al (2008) A seismic source zone model for the seismic hazard assessment of the Italian territory. Tectonophysics 450:85–108. doi:10.​1016/​j.​tecto.​2008.​01.​003 CrossRef Melletti C, D’Amico V, Martinelli F (2009) SHARE D3.3—homogeneous assessment of the maximum magnitude. Brusselles Müller RD, Sdrolias M, Gaina C, Roest WR (2008) Age, spreading rates, and spreading asymmetry of the world’s ocean crust. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 9:n/a–n/a. doi:10.​1029/​2007GC001743 Musson RMW (1999) Probabilistic seismic hazard maps for the north Balkan region. Ann Geophys 42:1109–1124 Musson RMW (2000) Generalised seismic hazard maps for the pannonian basin using probabilistic methods. Pure Appl Geophys 157:147–169. doi:10.​1007/​PL00001092 CrossRef Musson RMW (2012) Interpreting intraplate tectonics for seismic hazard: a UK historical perspective. J Seismol 16:261–273. doi:10.​1007/​s10950-011-9268-1 CrossRef Musson RMW, Sellami S, Brüstle W (2009) Preparing a seismic hazard model for Switzerland: the view from PEGASOS Expert Group 3 (EG1c). Swiss J Geosci 102:107–120. doi:10.​1007/​s00015-008-1301-1 CrossRef Pagani M, Monelli D, Weatherill G et al (2014) OpenQuake Engine: an open hazard (and risk) software for the Global Earthquake Model. Seismol Res Lett 85:692–702. doi:10.​1785/​0220130087 CrossRef Papaioannou CA, Papazachos BC (2010) Time-independent and time-dependent seismic hazard in Greece based on seismogenic sources. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:22–33 CrossRef Pavlides S, Caputo R, Sboras SP et al (2010) The Greek catalog if active faults and database of seismogenic sources. Bull Geol Soc Greece 43:486–494 Pondrelli S, Morelli A, Ekström G et al (2002) European-Mediterranean regional centroid-moment tensors: 1997–2000. Phys Earth Planet Inter 130:71–101. doi:10.​1016/​S0031-9201(01)00312-0 CrossRef Reiter L (1990) Earthquake hazard analysis: issues and insights. Columbia University Press, New York Scherbaum F, Delavaud E, Riggelsen C (2009) Model selection in seismic hazard analysis: an information-theoretic perspective. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:3234–3247. doi:10.​1785/​0120080347 CrossRef Schmid SM, Slejko D (2009) Seismic source characterization of the Alpine foreland in the context of a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis by PEGASOS Expert Group 1 (EG1a). Swiss J Geosci 102:121–148. doi:10.​1007/​s00015-008-1300-2 CrossRef Schwartz DP, Coppersmith KJ (1984) Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas fault zones. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 89:5681–5698 CrossRef Siebert L, Simkin T (2002) Volcanoes of the world: an illustrated catalog of Holocene Volcanoes and their eruptions. Smithsonian Institution, Global Volcanism Program Digital Information Series, GVP-3. http://​www.​volcano.​si.​edu Sleijko D, Peruzza L, Rebez A (1998) Seismic hazard maps of Italy. Ann Geophys 41:183–214 Sleijko D, Camassi R, Cecic I et al (1999) Seismic hazard assessment for Adria. Ann Geophys 42:1085–1107 Sokolov VY, Wenzel F, Mohindra R (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Romania and sensitivity analysis: a case of joint consideration of intermediate-depth (Vrancea) and shallow (crustal) seismicity. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:364–381. doi:10.​1016/​j.​soildyn.​2008.​04.​004 CrossRef Sørensen MB, Stromeyer D, Grünthal G (2010) A macroseismic intensity prediction equation for intermediate depth earthquakes in the Vrancea region, Romania. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:1268–1278. doi:10.​1016/​j.​soildyn.​2010.​05.​009 CrossRef Spudich P, Chiou BSJ (2008) Directivity in NGA earthquake ground motions: analysis using isochrone theory. Earthq Spectra 24:279. doi:10.​1193/​1.​2928225 CrossRef Stirling MW, McVerry GH, Berryman KR (2002) A new seismic hazard model for New Zealand. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:1878–1903. doi:10.​1785/​0120010156 CrossRef Stirling M, McVerry G, Gerstenberger M et al (2012) National seismic hazard model for New Zealand: 2010 update. Bull Seismol Soc Am 102:1514–1542. doi:10.​1785/​0120110170 CrossRef Stiros SC (2010) The 8.5+ magnitude, AD365 earthquake in Crete: coastal uplift, topography changes, archaeological and historical signature. Quat Int 216:54–63. doi:10.​1016/​j.​quaint.​2009.​05.​005 CrossRef Strasser FO, Arango MC, Bommer JJ (2010) Scaling of the source dimensions of interface and intraslab subduction-zone earthquakes with moment magnitude. Seismol Res Lett 81:941–950. doi:10.​1785/​gssrl.​81.​6.​941 CrossRef Stucchi M, Meletti C, Montaldo V et al (2011) Seismic hazard assessment (2003–2009) for the Italian building code. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:1885–1911. doi:10.​1785/​0120100130 CrossRef Stucchi M, Rovida A, Gomez Capera AA et al (2012) The SHARE European Earthquake Catalogue (SHEEC) 1000–1899. J Seismol 17:523–544. doi:10.​1007/​s10950-012-9335-2 CrossRef Toro GR, Abrahamson NA, Schneider JF (1997) Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in central and eastern North America: best estimates and uncertainties. Seismol Res Lett 68:41–57. doi:10.​1785/​gssrl.​68.​1.​41 CrossRef Van Houtte C, Drouet S, Cotton F (2011) Analysis of the origins of (Kappa) to compute hard rock to rock adjustment factors for GMPEs. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:2926–2941. doi:10.​1785/​0120100345 CrossRef Vanneste K, Camelbeeck T, Verbeeck K (2013) A model of composite seismic sources for the lower Rhine Graben, northwest Europe. Bull Seismol Soc Am 103:984–1007. doi:10.​1785/​0120120037 CrossRef Vilanova SP, Nemser ES, Besana-Ostman GM et al (2014) Incorporating descriptive metadata into seismic source zone models for seismic-hazard assessment: a case study of the Azores-West Iberian region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104:1212–1229. doi:10.​1785/​0120130210 CrossRef Weatherill G, Danciu L, Crowley H (2013) Future directions for seismic input in European design codes in the context of the seismic hazard harmonisation in Europe (SHARE) project. Vienna conference on earthquake engineering and structural dynamics pp 28–30 Weichert DH (1980) Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal observation periods. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:1337–1346 Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002 Wheeler BRL (2009) Methods of M max estimation east of the rocky mountains. Open file report 2009-1018, USGS Wheeler RL (2011) Reassessment of stable continental regions. Seismol Res Lett 82:141–143. doi:10.​1785/​gssrl CrossRef Wiemer S, García-Fernández M, Burg J-P (2009a) Development of a seismic source model for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of nuclear power plant sites in Switzerland: the view from PEGASOS Expert Group 4 (EG1d). Swiss J Geosci 102:189–209. doi:10.​1007/​s00015-009-1311-7 CrossRef Wiemer S, Giardini D, Fäh D et al (2009b) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Switzerland: best estimates and uncertainties. J Seismol 13:449–478. doi:10.​1007/​s10950-008-9138-7 CrossRef Yenier E, Sandikkaya MA, Akkar S (2010) SHARE D4.1—updated strong-ground motion database. Bruxelles Youngs RR, Coppersmith KJ (1985) Implications of fault slip rates and earthquake recurrence models to probabilistic seismic hazard estimates. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:939–964 Youngs RR, Chiou SJ, Silva WJ, Humphrey JR (1997) Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68:58–73. doi:10.​1785/​gssrl.​68.​1.​58 CrossRef Zhao JX (2006) Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:898–913. doi:10.​1785/​0120050122 CrossRefen
dc.description.obiettivoSpecifico3T. Pericolosità sismica e contributo alla definizione del rischioen
dc.description.journalTypeJCR Journalen
dc.description.fulltextrestricteden
dc.relation.issn1570-761Xen
dc.relation.eissn1573-1456en
dc.contributor.authorWoessner, J.en
dc.contributor.authorDanciu, L.en
dc.contributor.authorGiardini, D.en
dc.contributor.authorCrowley, H.en
dc.contributor.authorCotton, F.en
dc.contributor.authorGrünthal, G.en
dc.contributor.authorValensise, G.en
dc.contributor.authorArvidsson, R.en
dc.contributor.authorBasili, R.en
dc.contributor.authorDemircioglu, M. B.en
dc.contributor.authorHiemer, S.en
dc.contributor.authorMeletti, C.en
dc.contributor.authorMusson, R. W.en
dc.contributor.authorRovida, A. N.en
dc.contributor.authorSesetyan, K.en
dc.contributor.authorStucchi, M.en
dc.contributor.authorThe SHARE Consortiumen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Earth Science, ETH Zurichen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Earth Science, ETH Zurichen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Earth Science, ETH Zurichen
dc.contributor.departmentEuropean Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering (EUCENTRE)en
dc.contributor.departmentLaboratoire de Géophysique Interne et Tectonophysique, Université Joseph Fourieren
dc.contributor.departmentSeismic Hazard and Stress Field, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciencesen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentSeismic Hazard and Stress Field, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciencesen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentEarthquake Research Institute, Kandilli Observatory, Bogazici Universityen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Earth Science, ETH Zurichen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentBritish Geological Surveyen
dc.contributor.departmentIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Milano-Pavia, Milano, Italiaen
dc.contributor.departmentEarthquake Research Institute, Kandilli Observatory, Bogazici Universityen
dc.contributor.departmentEuropean Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering (EUCENTRE)en
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptETH, Zurich,Switzerland-
crisitem.author.deptETH Zurich, Switzerland-
crisitem.author.deptEUCENTRE, Italy-
crisitem.author.deptISTerre, Université Joseph Fourier, CNRS, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble, France-
crisitem.author.deptGeoForschungsZentrum, Potsdam, Germany-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptSeismic Hazard and Stress Field, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Roma1, Roma, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptBogazici University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute-
crisitem.author.deptSwiss Seismological Service, ETH Zurich, Institute of Geophysics, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Pisa, Pisa, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptBritish Geological Survey-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, Milano, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia-
crisitem.author.deptIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Bologna, Bologna, Italia-
crisitem.author.dept0-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4086-8755-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1216-1245-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9242-3996-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5992-8362-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7631-1903-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1213-0828-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2571-8345-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6147-9981-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5870-1542-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.author.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent04. Solid Earth-
crisitem.classification.parent05. General-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
crisitem.department.parentorgIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia-
Appears in Collections:Article published / in press
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
2015_Woessner_etal_BEE_Printed.pdfMain article, printed version12.5 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 20

186
checked on Feb 10, 2021

Page view(s) 10

1,109
checked on Apr 20, 2024

Download(s)

49
checked on Apr 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric