Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2122/10298
AuthorsSandri, L.* 
Costa, A.* 
Selva, J.* 
Tonini, R.* 
Macedonio, G.* 
Folch, A.* 
Sulpizio, R.* 
TitleBeyond eruptive scenarios: assessing tephra fallout hazard from Neapolitan volcanoes
Issue DateApr-2016
Series/Report no./6 (2016)
DOI10.1038/srep24271
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/2122/10298
KeywordsEruptive scenarios
Tephra fallout hazard
Power law
Subject Classification04. Solid Earth::04.08. Volcanology::04.08.08. Volcanic risk 
AbstractAssessment of volcanic hazards is necessary for risk mitigation. Typically, hazard assessment is based on one or a few, subjectively chosen representative eruptive scenarios, which use a specific combination of eruptive sizes and intensities to represent a particular size class of eruption. While such eruptive scenarios use a range of representative members to capture a range of eruptive sizes and intensities in order to reflect a wider size class, a scenario approach neglects to account for the intrinsic variability of volcanic eruptions, and implicitly assumes that inter-class size variability (i.e. size difference between different eruptive size classes) dominates over intra-class size variability (i.e. size difference within an eruptive size class), the latter of which is treated as negligible. So far, no quantitative study has been undertaken to verify such an assumption. Here, we adopt a novel Probabilistic Volcanic Hazard Analysis (PVHA) strategy, which accounts for intrinsic eruptive variabilities, to quantify the tephra fallout hazard in the Campania area. We compare the results of the new probabilistic approach with the classical scenario approach. The results allow for determining whether a simplified scenario approach can be considered valid, and for quantifying the bias which arises when full variability is not accounted for.
Appears in Collections:Papers Published / Papers in press

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
mainREVISED_FINAL.pdf14.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

96
checked on May 27, 2017

Download(s)

48
checked on May 27, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric