<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection: 02.03.02. Atmospheric Chemistry</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2122/136</link>
    <description />
    <textInput>
      <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>search</name>
      <link>http://www.earth-prints.org/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>Reply to comment by A. Kopf on ‘‘Methane emission from the mud volcanoes of Sicily (Italy)’’, and notice on CH4 flux data from European mud volcanoes</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2122/517</link>
      <description>Title: Reply to comment by A. Kopf on ‘‘Methane emission from the mud volcanoes of Sicily (Italy)’’, and notice on CH4 flux data from European mud volcanoes
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Etiope, G.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Roma2, Roma, Italia; Caracausi, A.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Palermo, Palermo, Italia; Favara, R.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Palermo, Palermo, Italia; Italiano, F.; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione Palermo, Palermo, Italia; Baciu, C.; Babes Bolyai University, Dept. of Geology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: The paper ‘‘Methane emission from the mud volcanoes&#xD;
of Sicily (Italy)’’ by Etiope et al. [2002] represents the&#xD;
first report ever done on experimental CH4 output data from&#xD;
subaerial mud volcanoes (MV). A review of available CH4&#xD;
flux data and detailed discussion about the global implications&#xD;
of mud volcanic CH4 emission has been made elsewhere&#xD;
[Etiope and Klusman, 2002; Morner and Etiope,&#xD;
2002].&#xD;
[2] The comment by Kopf [2003] contributes to open&#xD;
discussions and to make the readership aware on how&#xD;
important this subject is. In this reply we wish to clarify&#xD;
that precise data of CH4 flux from geologic sources are&#xD;
beginning to be available only now. It would be opportune&#xD;
that the MV-expert community could agree in using a&#xD;
common unit for the gas flux. We propose t y 1 and Mt&#xD;
y 1, and not metres cubed, consistently with the data&#xD;
reported for the methane sources/sinks budget by the IPCC.&#xD;
[3] Sicilian MVs, the first to be measured in detail, are&#xD;
considerably much smaller than the Azeri Ashgil MV,&#xD;
mentioned by Kopf [2003], and it is therefore obvious to&#xD;
expect a lower gas flux. Anyway the Dashgil mud volcano&#xD;
flux data are not based on exact measurements but only on&#xD;
visual estimates of the bubbles [Hovland et al., 1997]. In&#xD;
order to fully reply to Kopf [2003], hereafter we briefly&#xD;
discuss the problem of how to estimate the total number of&#xD;
MVs in the world and present new data from other European&#xD;
MVs, recently investigated. Finally, we outline the global importance of mud volcanic CH4 emission, as Kopf&#xD;
[2003] and recent literature is stressing.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

